Dessie ZG, Zewotir T. Mortality-related risk factors of COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 42 studies and 423,117 patients. BMC Infect Dis. 2021;21:855. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-021-06536-3.
Google Scholar
World Health Organization. Infection prevention and control during health care when coronavirus disease (COVID-19) is suspected or confirmed: Interim guidance. 2021. Accessed 27 Nov 2024.
Annac K, Fieselmann J, Wahidie D, Ölcer S, Audia A, Yilmaz-Aslan Y, Brzoska P. Entwicklung eines handlungskatalogs Zur bewältigung pandemiebedingter herausforderungen in der medizinischen rehabilitation Aus intersektionaler Multi-Stakeholder-Perspektive [Development of a catalogue of actions to overcome pandemic-related challenges in medical rehabilitation from an intersectional multi-stakeholder perspective]. Deutsche Rentenversicherung. 2023;78:3–23.
Heide MS, Bauer J, Hagen B, Otto-Albrecht M, Schiller J, Niehaus M. Lernen von der COVID-19-Pandemie: handlungsfelder für eine Zukunftsfähige gestaltung der ambulanten Beruflichen rehabilitation. [Learning from the COVID-19 pandemic: fields of action for a sustainable organisation of outpatient vocational rehabilitation]. Rehabilitation (Stuttg). 2023;62:9–12. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1997-5766.
Google Scholar
German Pension Insurance. Reha-Bericht 2023. [Reha-Report 2023]; 2023.
Bethge M, Fauser D, Zollmann P, Streibelt M. Reduced requests for medical rehabilitation because of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: A Difference-in-Differences analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2022;103:14–e192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2021.07.791.
Google Scholar
Rauch A, Reims N. Berufliche Rehabilitation in Zeiten der Covid-19-Pandemie. [Vocational Rehabilitation in Times of the Covid-19 Pandemic.]. Rehabilitation (Stuttg). 2024. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2374-2467.
Federal Employment Agency, Arbeitsmarktberichterstattung S. Berichte: Arbeitsmarkt kompakt – Auswirkungen der Corona-Krise [Statistics/Labour market reporting, reports: labour market compact – effects of the corona crisis]. Nuremberg; 2020. Available from: Accessed 24 Jan 2025.
Federal Employment Agency, Arbeitsmarktberichterstattung S. Berichte: Arbeitsmarkt kompakt – Auswirkungen der Corona-Krise [Statistics/Labour market reporting, Reports: Effects of the coronavirus crisis on the labour and training market – two years of the pandemic]. Nuremberg; 2022. Available from: Accessed 24 Jan 2025.
Bauer A, Weber E. COVID-19: how much unemployment was caused by the shutdown in germany? Appl Econ Lett. 2021;28:1053–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2020.1789544.
World Health Organization. International classification of functioning, disability and health: ICF. Genf: WHO; 2001.
Kus S, Oberhauser C, Simmel S, Coenen M. ICF-based prediction of return to work after trauma rehabilitation: results of the IcfPROreha study in patients with severe musculoskeletal injuries. Front Rehabil Sci. 2022;3:960473. https://doi.org/10.3389/fresc.2022.960473.
Google Scholar
Duong HP, Garcia A, Hilfiker R, Léger B, Luthi F. Systematic review of biopsychosocial prognostic factors for return to work after acute orthopedic trauma: A 2020 update. Front Rehabil Sci. 2021;2:791351. https://doi.org/10.3389/fresc.2021.791351.
Google Scholar
Streibelt M, Egner U. Eine systematische übersichtsarbeit Zu Den Einflussfaktoren auf die berufliche wiedereingliederung Nach Beruflichen bildungsleistungen. [A systematic review of the predictors of return to work following vocational retraining]. Rehabilitation (Stuttg). 2013;52:111–8. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0032-1323670.
Google Scholar
Breidenbach C, Ernstmann N, Schellack S, Degenhardt M, Heidkamp P, Heier L, et al. Rückkehr in Das Erwerbsleben Nach Krebs – eine systematische übersichtsarbeit Zu Prädiktoren in deutschland. [Return to Work after Cancer – a Systematic Review of Predictors in Germany]. Rehabilitation (Stuttg). 2024;63:229–37. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2300-3524.
Google Scholar
Gragnano A, Negrini A, Miglioretti M, Corbière M. Common psychosocial factors predicting return to work after common mental disorders, cardiovascular diseases, and cancers: A review of reviews supporting a Cross-Disease approach. J Occup Rehabil. 2018;28:215–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-017-9714-1.
Google Scholar
Hetzel C, Streibelt M. Hängt die berufliche wiedereingliederung Nach Beruflichen bildungsleistungen vom arbeitsmarkt ab? [Does Return to Work after Vocational Retraining Depend on Labour Market?]. Rehabilitation (Stuttg). 2016;55:290–8. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-113932.
Google Scholar
Elm E, Schreiber G, Haupt CC. Methodische anleitung für scoping reviews (JBI-Methodologie). [Methodological guidance for scoping reviews (JBI methodology)]. Zeitschrift für Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualität im Gesundheitswesen. 2019;143:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.zefq.2019.05.004
Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, O‘Brien KK, Colquhoun H, Levac D, et al. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med. 2018;169:467–73. https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-0850.
Google Scholar
Pollock D, Peters MDJ, Khalil H, McInerney P, Alexander L, Tricco AC, et al. Recommendations for the extraction, analysis, and presentation of results in scoping reviews. JBI Evid Synth. 2023;21:520–32. https://doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-22-00123.
Google Scholar
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151:264–9. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135.
Google Scholar
Langhammer T, Peters C, Ertle A, Hilbert K, Lueken U. Impact of COVID-19 pandemic related stressors on patients with anxiety disorders: A cross-sectional study. PLoS ONE. 2022;17:e0272215. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0272215.
Google Scholar
Senf W. Verlust natürlicher selbstverständlichkeiten. [Loss of natural things we take for granted]. In: Bering R, Eichenberg C, editors. Die psyche in Zeiten der Corona-Krise. Herausforderungen und lösungsansätze für psychotherapeuten und soziale helfer [The psyche in times of the corona crisis. Challenges and solutions for psychotherapists and social helpers]. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta; 2021. pp. 17–36.
Eckhard A, Bering R. Das bio-psycho-soziale modell der pandemischen stressbelastung. [The biopsychosocial model of pandemic stress]. In: Bering R, Eichenberg C, editors. Die psyche in Zeiten der Corona-Krise. Herausforderungen und lösungsansätze für psychotherapeuten und soziale helfer [The psyche in times of the corona crisis. Challenges and solutions for psychotherapists and social helpers]. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta; 2021. pp. 37–47.
Röhnsch G, Flick U. Umgang Mit subjektiv erlebten coronarisiken: sichtweisen Junger Chronisch Kranker erwachsener [Dealing with subjectively experienced corona risks: perspectives of young chronically ill adults]. Präv Gesundheitsf. 2024;19:109–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11553-023-01020-z.
Google Scholar
Keller FM, Dahmen A, Derksen C, Kötting L, Lippke S. Psychosomatic rehabilitation patients and the general population during COVID-19: online Cross-sectional and longitudinal study of digital trainings and rehabilitation effects. JMIR Ment Health. 2021;8:e30610. https://doi.org/10.2196/30610.
Google Scholar
Savard J, Jobin-Théberge A, Massicotte V, Banville C. How did women with breast cancer experience the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic? A qualitative study. Support Care Cancer. 2021;29:5721–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-021-06089-w.
Google Scholar
Marotta N, Demeco A, Moggio L, Ammendolia A. Why is telerehabilitation necessary? A pre-post COVID-19 comparative study of ICF activity and participation. J ENABLING Technol. 2021;15:117–21. https://doi.org/10.1108/JET-11-2020-0047.
Google Scholar
Boehle M, Buschmann-Steinhage R, Schmidt-Ohlemann M, Seidel M, Warnach M. Corona-Konsultationsprozess der Deutschen Vereinigung für Rehabilitation. Themenfeld 1: Gesundheitsversorgung und Medizinische Rehabilitation [Corona consultation process of the German Association for Rehabilitation. Sub-report on topic area 1: Healthcare and medical rehabilitation]. Heidelberg; 2021. Available from: Accessed 10 Jan 2025.
DeSouza A, Wang D, Wong JJ, Furlan AD, Hogg-Johnson S, Macedo L, et al. Characteristics of Canadians living with long-term health conditions or disabilities who had unmet rehabilitation needs during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional study. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0000000000002388.
Google Scholar
Tengilimoğlu D, Gönüllü U, Işık O, Tosun N, Zekioğlu A, Tengilimoğlu O, Younis M. The problems experienced by employees with chronic disease during the COVID-19 pandemic. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19010578.
Google Scholar
DeSouza A, Wang D, Wong JJ, Furlan AD, Hogg-Johnson S, Macedo L, et al. Prevalence of unmet rehabilitation needs among Canadians living with Long-term conditions or disabilities during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2024;105:268–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2023.07.010.
Google Scholar
Pervan L, Parker S, Wheeler M, Dark F. Understanding the impact of COVID-19 on people with severe and persistent mental illness within rehabilitation services: a thematic analysis. J Psychosoc Rehabil Ment Health. 2022;1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40737-022-00320-5.
Raiser P, Bürkle S, Fleischmann H, Mäder-Linke C, Rummel C, Tönsmeise C. Die Corona-Pandemie Zeigt die unverzichtbare Vernetzung von leistungen Zur versorgung abhängigkeitskranker auf [The Corona Pandemic Demonstrates the Indispensable Need for Networking amongst Addiction Care Services]. Sucht. 2020;66:195–200. https://doi.org/10.1024/0939-5911/a000668.
Google Scholar
Ksinan Jiskrova G, Bobák M, Pikhart H, Ksinan AJ. Job loss and lower healthcare utilisation due to COVID-19 among older adults across 27 European countries. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2021;75:1078–83. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech-2021-216715.
Google Scholar
Beck-Hiestermann FML, Kästner D, Gumz A. Onlinepsychotherapie in Zeiten der Corona-Pandemie: Querschnittsbefragung Deutscher psychotherapeuten. [Online psychotherapy in times of coronavirus disease 2019: Cross-sectional survey of German psychotherapists]. Psychotherapeut. 2021;66:372–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00278-021-00519-0.
Google Scholar
Cartledge S, Rawstorn JC, Tran M, Ryan P, Howden EJ, Jackson A. Telehealth is here to stay but not without challenges: a consultation of cardiac rehabilitation clinicians during COVID-19 in victoria, Australia. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2022;21:548–58. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurjcn/zvab118.
Google Scholar
Zybarth D, Brandt M, Mundlos C, Inhestern L. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on health care and daily life of patients with rare diseases from the perspective of patient organizations – A qualitative interview study. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2023;18:154. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13023-023-02771-w.
Google Scholar
Candelaria D, Kirkness A, Farrell M, Roach K, Gooley L, Fletcher A, et al. Remote-delivered cardiac rehabilitation during COVID-19: a prospective cohort comparison of health-related quality of life outcomes and patient experiences. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2022;21:732–40. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurjcn/zvac006.
Google Scholar
Guhlemann K, Georg A, Ketzmerick T. Handlungsstrategien von unternehmen und beschäftigten in Zeiten von Corona [Action strategies of companies and employees in times of Corona]. Arbeit. 2022;31:175–94. https://doi.org/10.1515/arbeit-2022-0010.
Google Scholar
Ludwig S, Zieschang H, Heitmann C, Taşkan-Karamürsel E. Corona made my home my office – Arbeit Im homeoffice Sicher und Gesund gestalten. [Corona made my home my office – making working from home safe and healthy]. In: Badura B, Ducki A, Schröder H, Meyer M, editors. Fehlzeiten-Report 2021: betriebliche Prävention stärken – Lehren Aus der pandemie. [Absenteeism Report 2021: Strengthening workplace prevention – lessons learnt from the pandemic]. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2021. pp. 349–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-63722-7_21.
Google Scholar
Liu X, Cheng A, Zeng Y, Zhang X, Peng X, Hu H, et al. Fears of COVID-19 and cancer recurrence related to work sustainability among male cancer survivors. J Men’s Health. 2021;17:49–54. https://doi.org/10.31083/JOMH.2021.012.
Wallberg M, Tinnerholm Ljungberg H, Björk Brämberg E, Nybergh L, Jensen I, Olsson C. Hindering and enabling factors for young employees with common mental disorder to remain at or return to work affected by the Covid-19 pandemic – a qualitative interview study with young employees and managers. PLoS ONE. 2023;18:e0286819. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0286819.
Google Scholar
Voermans MAC, den Boer MC, Wilthagen T, Embregts, Petri JCM. Long-term social restrictions and lack of work activities during the COVID-19 pandemic: impact on the daily lives of people with intellectual disabilities. Disabil Rehabil. 2023;45:4122–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2022.2147227.
Google Scholar
Masuku KP, Khumalo G, Shabangu N. The effects of COVID-19 on the rehabilitation of persons with aphasia: A scoping review. S Afr J Commun Disord. 2022;69:e1–9. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajcd.v69i2.920.
Google Scholar
Haskiah F, Jbara R, Minha S, Assali A, Sela Y, Pereg D. The impact of COVID-19 pandemic on cardiac rehabilitation of patients following acute coronary syndrome. PLoS ONE. 2022;17:e0276106. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0276106.
Google Scholar
Anghel R, Adam CA, Marcu DTM, Mitu O, Mitu F. Cardiac rehabilitation in patients with peripheral artery Disease-A literature review in COVID-19 era. J Clin Med. 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11020416.
Google Scholar
Visser M de, Anema J, Huysmans M, de Graaf-Zijl M. Work and health during the COVID-19 crisis among Dutch workers and jobseekers with (partial) work disabilities: a mixed methods study. ResearchSquare. 2022. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2258311/v1.
Dehn LB, Böske N, Beblo T, Steinhart I, Stengler K, Driessen M. Vocational perspectives for people with mental illness under Corona conditions: an exploratory brief survey. [Vocational perspectives for people with mental illness under Corona conditions: an exploratory brief survey.. Psychiatr Prax. 2022;49:152–5. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1623-4622.
Google Scholar
Veldsman D, van Aarde N. The impact of COVID-19 on an employee assistance programme in a multinational insurance organisation: considerations for the future. SA J Industrial Psychol. 2021. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajip.v47i0.1863.
Google Scholar
Boehle M, Buschmann-Steinhage R, Schmidt-Ohlemann M, Seidel M, Warnach M. Corona-Konsultationsprozess der Deutschen Vereinigung für Rehabilitation. Themenfeld 2: Arbeitsleben (einschl. Leistungen zur Teilhabe am Arbeitsleben) [Corona consultation process of the German Association for Rehabilitation. Sub-report on topic area 2: Working life (including benefits for participation in working life)]. Heidelberg; 2021. Available at: Accessed 10 Dec 2024.
McNamara CL, Kotzias V, Bambra C, Labonté R, Stuckler D, Have. COVID-19 stimulus packages mitigated the negative health impacts of pandemic-Related job losses? A systematic review of global evidence from the first year of the pandemic. Int J Soc Determinants Health Health Serv. 2023;53:311–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/27551938231176374.
Flüter-Hoffmann C, Traub P. Menschen Mit behinderungen Im Homeoffice – Erleichterung für die inklusion? Eine gegenüberstellung von Deutschland und Einigen Angelsächsischen ländern. [People with disabilities working from home: facilitating inclusion? A comparison of Germany and some Anglo-Saxon countries]. Köln: Institut der deutschen Wirtschaft (IW); 2023.
Bubbico L, Bellizzi S, Ferlito S, Maniaci A, Leone Guglielmotti R, Antonelli G, et al. The impact of COVID-19 on individuals with hearing and visual disabilities during the first pandemic wave in Italy. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph181910208.
Google Scholar
Walter U, Rotzoll J. Corona und die folgen für Das betriebliche gesundheitsmanagement Aus sicht der Expert:innen – Ergebnisse einer qualitativen studie. [Corona and the consequences for occupational health management from the experts’ perspective – results of a qualitative study]. In: Badura B, Ducki A, Schröder H, Meyer M, editors. Fehlzeiten-Report 2021: betriebliche Prävention stärken – Lehren Aus der pandemie [Absenteeism Report 2021: Strengthening workplace prevention – lessons learnt from the pandemic]. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2021. pp. 105–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-63722-7_6.
Google Scholar
Füllemann D, Schönholzer T, Flükiger N, Nauser O, Jenny G, Jensen R, Krause A. Betriebliches Gesundheitsmanagement in der Schweiz: Monitoring-Ergebnisse 2020 [Occupational health management in Switzerland: monitoring results 2020]; 2020. Available at: Accessed 24 Jan 2025.
Boockmann B, König T, Laub N, Becker C, Meta-Studie. Covid-19-Pandemie und betriebliche Anpassungsmaßnahmen. Begleitforschung für die Arbeitsweltberichterstattung im Auftrag des BMAS, Band 4. [Meta-study: Covid-19 pandemic and company adaptation measures. Accompanying research for reporting on the world of work BMAS, Band 4]; 2021. Available at: Accessed 24 Jan 2025.
Hower K, Winter W. Pandemiebedingte herausforderungen in der Pflege – Ansätze für die betriebliche gesundheitsförderung. [Pandemic-related challenges in care – approaches for workplace health promotion]. In: Badura B, Ducki A, Schröder H, Meyer M, editors. Fehlzeiten-Report 2021: betriebliche Prävention stärken – Lehren Aus der pandemie. [Absenteeism Report 2021: Strengthening workplace prevention – lessons learnt from the pandemic]. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2021. pp. 379–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-63722-7_23.
Google Scholar
Schulz AA, Unden M. Betriebliches gesundheitsmanagement während der Corona Pandemie – Best practices & lessons learned (Deutsche bahn AG). [Occupational health management during the corona pandemic – best practices & lessons learned (Deutsche bahn AG)]. In: Badura B, Ducki A, Schröder H, Meyer M, editors. Fehlzeiten-Report 2021: betriebliche Prävention stärken – Lehren Aus der pandemie. [Absenteeism Report 2021: Strengthening workplace prevention – lessons learnt from the pandemic]. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2021. pp. 397–404. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-63722-7_24.
Google Scholar
Vitturi BK, Rahmani A, Montecucco A, Dini G, Durando P. Occupational outcomes of people with multiple sclerosis during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Front Public Health. 2023;11:1217843. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1217843.
Google Scholar
Robins-Browne K, Lewis M, Burchill LJ, Gilbert C, Johnson C, O’Donnell M, et al. Interventions to support the mental health and well-being of front-line healthcare workers in hospitals during pandemics: an evidence review and synthesis. BMJ Open. 2022;12:e061317. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061317.
Google Scholar
Sommer S, Backhaus N, Tisch A. [Current and future challenges for occupational health and safety against the backdrop of the coronavirus pandemic]. In: Badura B, Ducki A, Schröder H, Meyer M, editors. Fehlzeiten-Report 2021: betriebliche Prävention stärken – Lehren Aus der pandemie. [Absenteeism Report 2021: Strengthening workplace prevention – lessons learnt from the pandemic]. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2021. pp. 247–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-63722-7_15.
Google Scholar
Bennett RJ, Manchaiah V, Eikelboom RH, Badcock JC, Swanapoel DW. International survey of audiologists during the COVID-19 pandemic: effects on mental well-being of audiologists. Int J Audiol. 2022;61:273–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/14992027.2021.1944675.
Google Scholar
Kabir M, Matharoo M, Dhar A, Gordon H, King J, Lockett M, et al. BSG cross-sectional survey on impact of COVID-19 recovery on workforce, workload and well-being. Frontline Gastroenterol. 2023;14:236–43. https://doi.org/10.1136/flgastro-2022-102298.
Google Scholar
Micali E, Chiarella EG. Burnout prevention in healthcare professionals during COVID-19. J Prev Med Hyg. 2023;64:E283–8. https://doi.org/10.15167/2421-4248/jpmh2023.64.3.2906.
Google Scholar
Tsai H-Y. The role of employee assistance programs under COVID-19-induced work-family conflict: effects on service employees’ work engagement and burnout. Scand J Psychol. 2023;64:663–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjop.12922.
Google Scholar
Branjerdporn G, Bowman C, Kenworthy S, Stapelberg NJC. Interventional response of hospital and health services to the mental health effects of viral outbreaks on health professionals. Front Psychiatry. 2022;13:812365. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2022.812365.
Google Scholar
Visser M, Graaf-Zijl M, Anema JR, Huysmans MA. Work and health during the COVID-19 crisis among Dutch workers and jobseekers with (partial) work disabilities: a mixed methods study. BMC Public Health. 2023;23:966. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-15720-w.
Google Scholar
Matthewson J, Tiplady A, Gerakios F, Foley A, Murphy E. Implementation and analysis of a telephone support service during COVID-19. Occup Med (Lond). 2020;70:375–81. https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqaa095.
Google Scholar
Mahdavi A, Atlasi R, Ebrahimi M, Azimian E, Naemi R. Human resource management (HRM) strategies of medical staff during the COVID-19 pandemic. Heliyon. 2023;9:e20355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20355.
Google Scholar
Häberle N, Lindner A, Vomstein M, Nolle I, Haug A, Nübling M, Lincke H-J. Die bewertung betrieblicher Maßnahmen Im COVID-19-Modul des COPSOQ. [The assessment of operational measures in the COVID-19 module of the COPSOQ]. Public Health Forum. 2022;30:95–100. https://doi.org/10.1515/pubhef-2022-0015.
Google Scholar
Muller AE, Hafstad EV, Himmels JPW, Smedslund G, Flottorp S, Stensland SØ, et al. The mental health impact of the covid-19 pandemic on healthcare workers, and interventions to help them: A rapid systematic review. Psychiatry Res. 2020;293:113441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113441.
Google Scholar
Drupp M, Meyer M, Winter W. Betriebliches gesundheitsmanagement (BGM) für Pflegeeinrichtungen und krankenhäuser unter pandemiebedingungen. [Occupational health management (OHM) for care facilities and hospitals under pandemic conditions]. In: Jacobs K, Kuhlmey A, Greß S, Klauber J, Schwinger A, editors. Pflege-Report 2021. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2021. pp. 71–89. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-63107-2_5.
Google Scholar
Jazieh AR, Chan SL, Curigliano G, Dickson N, Eaton V, Garcia-Foncillas J, et al. Delivering cancer care during the COVID-19 pandemic: recommendations and lessons learned from ASCO global webinars. JCO Glob Oncol. 2020;6:1461–71. https://doi.org/10.1200/GO.20.00423.
Google Scholar
Zheng Y, Tang PK, Lin G, Liu J, Hu H, Wu AMS, Ung COL. Burnout among healthcare providers: its prevalence and association with anxiety and depression during the COVID-19 pandemic in macao, China. PLoS ONE. 2023;18:e0283239. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0283239.
Google Scholar
Bartek B, Jung T, Schwiedernoch A, Perka C, Palmowski Y. Einfluss der COVID-19-Pandemie auf die physiotherapeutische und ärztliche Nachsorge Nach rekonstruktionen des Vorderen Kreuzbandes [Influence of the COVID-19 pandemic on the physiotherapeutic and medical follow-up care after reconstructions of the anterior cruciate ligament]. [Influence of the COVID-19 pandemic on the physiotherapeutic and medical follow-up care after reconstructions of the anterior cruciate ligament]. Orthopäde. 2022;51:403–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00132-021-04197-3.
Google Scholar
Sokal L, Trudel LE. A recovery pathway after COVID-19 teacher burnout. J Social Behav Health Sci. 2023;17:352–70. https://doi.org/10.5590/JSBHS.2022.16.1.24.
Google Scholar
Brünger M, Köhn S, Burchardi JM, Schlumbohm A, Jansen E, Schall F, et al. Auswirkungen der SARS-CoV‐2-Pandemie auf zugang, inanspruchnahme und ausgestaltung der Sucht-Rehabilitation (CoV-AZuR). Abschlussbericht.[Effects of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic on access, utilisation and design of addiction rehabilitation (CoV-AZuR). Final report.]: Zenodo; 2024.
Ne’eman A, Maestas N. How has COVID-19 impacted disability employment? Disabil Health J. 2023;16:101429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dhjo.2022.101429.
Google Scholar
Vigna E, Meek A, Beyer S. The impact of COVID-19 pandemic on jobs for people with intellectual disabilities and autism in Wales. J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2024;37:e13194. https://doi.org/10.1111/jar.13194.
Google Scholar
Booke F, Fauser D, Reims N, Bethge M. Unemployment due to the SARS-CoV-2-pandemic among people with and without severe disabilities: a difference-in-differences analysis. Occup Environ Med. 2022;79:494–6. https://doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2021-108125.
Google Scholar
Houtenville AJ, Paul S, Brucker DL. Changes in the employment status of people with and without disabilities in the united States during the COVID-19 pandemic. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2021;102:1420–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2021.03.019.
Google Scholar
Wong J, Ezeife N, Kudla A, Crown D, Trierweiler R, Capraro P, et al. Employment consequences of COVID-19 for people with disabilities and employers. J Occup Rehabil. 2022;32:464–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-021-10012-9.
Google Scholar
Park J, Sung C, Fisher MH, Okyere C, Kammes RR. Psychosocial and vocational impacts of COVID-19 on people with and without disabilities. Rehabil Psychol. 2022;67:381–90. https://doi.org/10.1037/rep0000420.
Google Scholar
Schug C, Geiser F, Hiebel N, Beschoner P, Jerg-Bretzke L, Albus C, et al. Sick leave and intention to quit the job among nursing staff in German hospitals during the COVID-19 pandemic. [Krankenstände und Kündigungsabsicht bei Pflegepersonal in deutschen Krankenhäusern während der COVID-19-Pandemie]. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19:1947. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19041947.
Google Scholar
Thimbriel R, Urkmez B, Lee B, Umucu E. COVID-19 stress, resilience, and job loss concerns in people with chronic conditions and disabilities. J Vocat Rehabil. 2022;57:207–13. https://doi.org/10.3233/JVR-221211.
Google Scholar
Janßen A, Fahrner J, Koppenhöfer J, Schneider S. Berufstätige Tumorpatient*innen – Hürden und Belastungen beim Wiedereinstieg oder Verbleib am Arbeitsplatz. [Working tumour patients – hurdles and burdens when returning to or remaining in the workplace]. Hochschule Esslingen. 2023. URL: https://www.aso-ag.eu/fileadmin/downloads/janssen-schneider-fahrner-koppenhoefer-projektbericht-2023.pdf.
Stephan G, Hetschko C, Schmidtke J, Lawes M, Eid M, Schöb R. Das „ German Job earch Panel: Die Effekte von Arbeitslosigkeit und Covid19 auf Das Wohlbefinden.[The ‘German job search Panel’: The effects of unemployment and Covid19 on well-being]. Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung; 2023. https://doi.org/10.48720/IAB.FB.2319.
Lima de Melo Ghisi G, Xu Z, Liu X, Mola A, Gallagher R et al. Impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on cardiac rehabilitation delivery around the world. medRxiv. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.11.11.20230045.
Schlitt A, Bestehorn K, Schwaab B. Situation der kardiologischen rehabilitation Im Rahmen der COVID-19-Pandemie in Deutschland – eine blitzumfrage der Deutschen gesellschaft für rehabilitation und Prävention von Herz-Kreislauferkrankungen (DGPR) Zur aktuellen situation (August 2020) [Cardiac rehabilitation during the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany – a quick poll of the German Society ofrehabilitation and Prevention ofHeart, Circulation Diseases (DGPR)]. [Cardiac rehabilitation during the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany – a quick poll of the German Society of rehabilitation and Prevention of Heart and Circulation Diseases (DGPR)]. Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2021;164:11–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.zefq.2021.04.005.
Google Scholar
Almasri NA, Dunst CJ, Hadoush H, Aldaod J, Khader Y, Alrjoub A, Almasri A. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and governmental policies on rehabilitation services and physical medicine in jordan: A retrospective study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20031972.
Google Scholar
Bestehorn K, Schwaab B, Schlitt A. Wie Stark hat die COVID-19-Pandemie die kardiologische rehabilitation Im Ersten Jahr der pandemie beeinflusst? Ein vergleich der leistungszahlen Aus 2019 Mit 2020 in Deutschland[Impact of COVID-19 on cardiac rehabilitation during the first year of the pandemic: A comparison of the performance numbers in Germany from 2019 and 2020]. [Impact of COVID-19 on cardiac rehabilitation during the first year of the pandemic: A comparison of the performance numbers in Germany from 2019 and 2020]. Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2022;173:22–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.zefq.2022.05.007.
Google Scholar
Lopez CJ, Edwards B, Langelier DM, Chang EK, Chafranskaia A, Jones JM. Delivering virtual cancer rehabilitation programming during the first 90 days of the COVID-19 pandemic: A multimethod study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2021;102:1283–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2021.02.002.
Google Scholar
Fauser D, Banaschak H, Zollmann P, Streibelt M, Bethge M. Auswirkungen der SARS-CoV-2-Pandemie auf die inanspruchnahme der Onkologischen rehabilitation: eine Difference-in-Differences-Analyse [Impact of the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic on the Utilization of Cancer rehabilitation: a Difference-in-Differences Analysis]. [Auswirkungen der SARS-CoV-2-Pandemie auf die inanspruchnahme der Onkologischen rehabilitation: eine Difference-in-Differences-Analyse]. Rehabilitation (Stuttg). 2023;62:104–12. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1936-4083.
Google Scholar
Belau MH, Misselwitz B, Meyding-Lamadé U, Bassa B. Trends in stroke severity at hospital admission and rehabilitation discharge before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in hesse, germany: a register-based study. Neurol Res Pract. 2024;6:18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42466-024-00308-5.
Google Scholar
Schöneck R. Auswirkungen des Coronabedingten lockdowns auf die stationäre rehabilitation von Suchtkranken [Effects of the corona-related lockdown on the inpatient rehabilitation of addicts]. SUCHT. 2020;66:265–9. https://doi.org/10.1024/0939-5911/a000680.
Google Scholar
Smolarczyk-Kosowska JA, Debski P, Szczegielniak AR, Piegza M, Pudlo R. Psychiatric rehabilitation amidst COVID-19: do pandemic restrictions affect the therapeutic efficiency? Appl Sci. 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/app122311930.
Holl J, Berning A, Benetik MJ, Frenkel MO, Bellm A, Ditzen B, et al. Psychosoziale belastung und psychosoziale unterstützung für fachkräfte Im gesundheitswesen während der COVID-19-Pandemie [Psychosocial distress and psychosocial support for healthcare professionals during the COVID-19 pandemic. What have employees of a university hospital experienced as helpful?]. Die Psychother. 2023;68:96–105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00278-022-00642-6.
Google Scholar
Rek SV, Freeman D, Reinhard MA, Bühner M, Grosen S, Falkai P, et al. Differential psychological response to the COVID-19 pandemic in psychiatric inpatients compared to a non-clinical population from Germany [Unterschiedliche psychologische Reaktionen auf die COVID-19-Pandemie bei stationären Psychiatriepatienten und Psychiatriepatientinnen im Vergleich zu einer nicht-klinischen Population aus Deutschland]. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin NeuroSci. 2022;272:67–79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00406-021-01291-7.
Google Scholar
Kaiser U, Nübling R, Schmidt J, Jorkowski J, Geier A, Reuß-Borst M. Psychosomatische rehabilitation in pandemiezeiten: eine multiperspektivische bewertung von Corona-bedingten Maßnahmen und deren zusammenhänge Mit zentralen Outcome-Parametern, der rehabilitanden zufriedenheit und dem Reha-Erfolg [Psychosomatic rehabilitation in times of pandemic: A multi-perspective evaluation of corona-related measures and their correlations with key outcome parameters, rehabilitant satisfaction and rehabilitation success]. PR. 2022;34:81–99. https://doi.org/10.5414/PRX0572.
Google Scholar
Senft B, Krenn M, Petz D, Hochfellner S. Medizinisch-psychiatrische rehabilitation in Österreich – Ein vergleich der symptombelastung Bei Reha-Beginn Vor und während der COVID-19-Pandemie, Sowie des rehabilitationserfolgs [Psychiatric rehabilitation in Austria – A Comparison of Symptoms at Admission Before and During COVID-19 Pandemic, as well as rehabilitation Success]. Rehabilitation (Stuttg). 2022;61:344–52. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1647-8566.
Google Scholar
Wood KC, Giri S, Kendig TD, Pergolotti M. In-Clinic versus hybrid cancer rehabilitation service delivery during the COVID-19 pandemic: an outcome comparison study. Curr Oncol. 2023;30:8916–27. https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol30100644.
Google Scholar
Das L, Sharma PK, Singh G, Goyal T. Telerehabilitation is as effective as outpatient visits in the management of early osteoarthritis knee and mechanical low backache. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2024;34:405–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-023-03673-0.
Google Scholar
Gu J, Tong X, Meng S, Xu S, Huang J. Remote cardiac rehabilitation program during the COVID-19 pandemic for patients with stable coronary artery disease after percutaneous coronary intervention: a prospective cohort study. BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2023;15:79. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13102-023-00688-2.
Google Scholar
Krzyzaniak N, Cardona M, Peiris R, Michaleff ZA, Greenwood H, Clark J, et al. Telerehabilitation versus face-to-face rehabilitation in the management of musculoskeletal conditions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Phys Therapy Reviews. 2023;28:71–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/10833196.2023.2195214.
Google Scholar
Fanget M, Bayle M, Labeix P, Roche F, Hupin D. Effects of cardiac telerehabilitation during COVID-19 on cardiorespiratory capacities in patients with coronary artery disease. Front Physiol. 2022;13:837482. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2022.837482.
Google Scholar
Alexander M. It’s Corona calling: time for telerehabilitation! J Frailty Sarcopenia Falls. 2020;5:86–8. https://doi.org/10.22540/JFSF-05-086.
Google Scholar
Goldman JG, Merkitch D, Brewington D, Peirce H, Rho M, Jayabalan P, et al. Patient experiences receiving rehabilitation care via telehealth: identifying opportunities for remote care. Front Rehabil Sci. 2023;4:1049554. https://doi.org/10.3389/fresc.2023.1049554.
Google Scholar
Chang P, Zheng J. Updates in cancer rehabilitation telehealth. Curr Phys Med Rehabil Rep. 2022;10:332–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40141-022-00372-5.
Google Scholar
Buckingham SA, Anil K, Demain S, Gunn H, Jones RB, Kent B, et al. Telerehabilitation for people with physical disabilities and movement impairment: A survey of united Kingdom practitioners. JMIRx Med. 2022;3:e30516. https://doi.org/10.2196/30516.
Google Scholar
Gorzelitz JS, Bouji N, Stout NL. Program barriers and facilitators in virtual cancer exercise implementation: A qualitative analysis. Transl J Am Coll Sports Med. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1249/tjx.0000000000000199.
Google Scholar
Booth G, Zala S, Mitchell C, Zarnegar R, Lucas A, Gilbert AW. The patient acceptability of a remotely delivered pain management programme for people with persistent musculoskeletal pain: A qualitative evaluation. Br J Pain. 2022;16:581–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/20494637221106411.
Google Scholar
Gebauer S, Gottwald F, Herter H-D, Kölzner K, Krüger E, Memmler F, et al. Rehavision: Chancen und Perspektiven der Beruflichen Rehabilitation. Sonderthema: Berufliche Rehabilitation in der Corona-Pandemie [Rehavision: Opportunities and prospects for vocational rehabilitation. Special topic: Vocational rehabilitation in the corona pandemic]. Rehavision. 2020:2. Available at: Accessed 9 Dec 2024.
Reims N, Rauch A, Nivorozhkin A. Herausforderungen und anpassungsstrategien von leistungserbringern in der Beruflichen Rehabilitation – Eine gemischt-methodische analyse [Challenges and Adaptation Strategies of Service Providers in Vocational Rehabilitation – A Mixed-Methods Analysis]. Rehabilitation (Stuttg). 2023;62:207–15. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2053-6763.
Google Scholar
Dallas B, Aquino K, Scott S. Vocational rehabilitation counselors’ perceptions on the impact of COVID-19: transition to remote services and support needs of VR clients. J Rehabilitation. 2022;88(2):4–10.
Sheppard-Jones K, Goldstein P, Leslie M, Singleton P, Gooden C, Rumrill P, et al. Reframing workplace inclusion through the lens of universal design: considerations for vocational rehabilitation professionals in the wake of COVID-19. J Vocat Rehabil. 2021;54:71–9. https://doi.org/10.3233/JVR-201119.
Google Scholar
Ahmed ZM, Khalil MF, Kohail AM, Eldesouky IF, Elkady A, Shuaib A. The prevalence and predictors of Post-Stroke depression and anxiety during COVID-19 pandemic. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2020;29:105315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2020.105315.
Google Scholar
Fisker J, Hjorthøj C, Hellström L, Mundy SS, Rosenberg NG, Eplov LF. Predictors of return to work for people on sick leave with common mental disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2022;95:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-021-01827-3.
Google Scholar
Zhong W, Liu R, Cheng H, Xu L, Wang L, He C, Wei Q. Longer-Term effects of cardiac telerehabilitation on patients with coronary artery disease: systematic review and Meta-Analysis. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2023;11:e46359. https://doi.org/10.2196/46359.
Google Scholar
Suso-Martí L, La Touche R, Herranz-Gómez A, Angulo-Díaz-Parreño S, Paris-Alemany A, Cuenca-Martínez F. Effectiveness of telerehabilitation in physical therapist practice: an umbrella and mapping review with Meta-Meta-Analysis. Phys Ther. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/pzab075.
Google Scholar
Cacciante L, Della Pietà C, Rutkowski S, Cieślik B, Szczepańska-Gieracha J, Agostini M, Kiper P. Cognitive telerehabilitation in neurological patients: systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurol Sci. 2022;43:847–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-021-05770-6.
Google Scholar
Lok V, Sjöqvist H, Sidorchuk A, Flodin P, Osika W, Daly M, et al. Changes in anxiety and depression during the COVID-19 pandemic in the European population: A meta-analysis of changes and associations with restriction policies. Eur Psychiatry. 2023;66:e87. https://doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2023.2467.
Google Scholar
Yuan K, Zheng Y-B, Wang Y-J, Sun Y-K, Gong Y-M, Huang Y-T, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis on prevalence of and risk factors associated with depression, anxiety and insomnia in infectious diseases, including COVID-19: a call to action. Mol Psychiatry. 2022;27:3214–22. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-022-01638-z.
Google Scholar
Aksoy O, Wu AF-W, Aksoy S, Rivas C. Social support and mental well-being among people with and without chronic illness during the Covid-19 pandemic: evidence from the longitudinal UCL Covid survey. BMC Psychol. 2024;12:136. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-024-01596-x.
Google Scholar
Boer DR, Hoekstra F, Huetink KIM, Hoekstra T, Krops LA, Hettinga FJ. Physical activity, sedentary behavior and Well-Being of adults with physical disabilities and/or chronic diseases during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic: A rapid review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18126342.
Google Scholar
Solmi M, Thompson T, Estradé A, Agorastos A, Radua J, Cortese S, et al. Global and risk-group stratified well-being and mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic in adults: results from the international COH-FIT study. Psychiatry Res. 2024;342:115972. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2024.115972.
Google Scholar
Sabariego C, Coenen M, Ito E, Fheodoroff K, Scaratti C, Leonardi M, et al. Effectiveness of integration and Re-Integration into work strategies for persons with chronic conditions: A systematic review of European strategies. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15030552.
Google Scholar
Wrage W, Sikora A, Wegewitz U. Umsetzung des betrieblichen Eingliederungsmanagements (BEM). [Implementation of company integration management (BEM)]. Federal Institute for Occupational Safety and Health; 2020. https://doi.org/10.21934/baua:fakten20201109.
Bühne D, Alles T, Hetzel C, Mozdzanowski M. Umsetzung des betrieblichen eingliederungsmanagements. Ergebnisse der erwerbstätigenbefragung [Implementation of company integration management. Results of the employee survey] 2018. ASU. 2022;2022:46–52. https://doi.org/10.17147/asu-1-161095.
Google Scholar
link